Leadership is shown in as something that can so easily be abused.
The Animalist revolution was supposed to have been carried out in order to emancipate the farm
animals from human oppressionyet no sooner hasachieved power than he starts treating the other
animals far worse than Mr. Jones ever did.
He likes to portray himself as a
strong, decisive leader; however, in actual fact, as well as being a ruthless, bloodthirsty
tyrant, Napoleon is also completely incompetent, unable even to ensure that the farm produces a
regular supply of food.
Whatappears to be driving at here is the idea that a
fanatical attachment to ideology all too often results in the rise to power of those singularly
incapable of exercising it responsibly. In totalitarian societies such as the one constructed by
Napoleon, a premium is placed on leaders who are ruthless and fanatical rather than skillful,
inspiring, or competent.undoubtedly displayed all three of these positive...
No comments:
Post a Comment