Pork barrel
    spending is spending that is intended for specific projects that benefit donor or constituent
    groups. Pork barrel spending can make legislation easier to pass because it allows for targeted
    incentives towards Congressional members that might otherwise be antagonistic towards
    legislation. Unfortunately, this kind of targeted benefit generally proliferates, as it gives
    even friendly legislators an incentive to take an opposing stance in a bid to obtain some pork
    barrel spending. This can lead to significant increases in spending and can blow holes in the
    budget.
A second important issue with pork barrel spending is that it can
    create inefficient funding streams. This is most visible in military spending, where certain
    projects that are unnecessary can continue because of the benefit they bring to specific groups.
    Certain pieces of military technology, such as Abrams tanks, continue to be purchased through
    appropriations legislation because so many different Congressional districts benefit from these
    purchases. The military doesn't need these additional tanks, though, so the continuing purchases
    force the military to spend money on something it doesn't need, which prevents funding from
    going to other projects which may be more useful. It also increases overall spending without
    providing a noticeable benefit.
No comments:
Post a Comment