In Shakespeare's Hamlet, how many chances did Hamlet have to kill Claudius? Why didn't Hamlet do it?

In his
play , Shakespeare really only gives us one
moment prior to the final scene in which had an
opportunity to kill King . That moment is in Act III, scene iii, and happens soon
after Claudius has seen the play in which his murder is pantomimed.

In
Act III, scene iii, Claudius informsthat he is sending Hamlet to
England and they are to supervise him. Claudius's purpose is to have England execute Hamlet.
Later in this scene, when Claudius is alone, he delivers aconfessing his murder. He also kneels
to pray to ask for forgiveness. It's while he is praying that Hamlet happens upon him and, since
Claudius is alone and unaware of...

What are four language techniques used in Romeo and Juliet Act II, Scene 2: 'Tis but thy name that is my enemy. Thou art thyself, though not a...

This
question provides a particular passage from the play; however, it does leave open the
possibility that it is asking about language techniques from the entire act and scene.

Based on the passage provided, a reader can see a fairly good example of the iambic
pentameter that Shakespeare so frequently employed throughout many of his pieces. Most of the
lines follow an unstressed/stressed syllable pattern and contain a total of ten syllables. Each
unstressed/stressed unit is an iambic foot, and five of them gives readers the pentameter. The
quote in question is also an example of . Blank verse has consistent rhythm and meter, but it
doesn't have rhyme.

The provided quote also has a couple of examples of
enjambment. Enjambment is a device that a poet will use when one line of verse spills over into
the next line without any kind of punctuation mark that would make a reader pause at the end of
the line.

Nor arm, nor face, nor any other
part

Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!

It is used again about a line later.

That which we call a rose

By
any other word would smell as sweet.

A general rule of thumb with enjambment is that it usually is combined with caesura.
A caesura is a pause within a line of verse, and it is usually marked by some kind of
punctuation. Readers can see a good example with both rhetorical questions thatasks. Those
question marks force a reader to pause, and they occur in the middle of a line.

Whats Montague? It is nor hand, nor foot,

Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part

Belonging to a man. O,
be some other name!

From "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathanial Hawthorne, how do the following lines foreshadow and symbolize the main theme of the story? It was all...

" "
is a character who ventures out in the
night to go to a meeting in the forest. He's leaving
behind his wife, Faith,
which also symbolizes the fact that he is straying from his religious
beliefs
that he was taught as a child and has always upheld until this moment. Little does
he
know that he will be shocked and disheartened by who he also sees on the
path to sin; he sees
all of the people in his life who had taught him about
living a good Christian/Puritan life.
After...

How can I write another ending, an alternate ending, of Emmaby Jane Austen? The story is already perfect and has a happy ending, but I have to write...

You
are correct when you suggest that you need to materially alter the plot
to develop a different ending. The way Austen constructs her novel,
there is no ending but the one she has written. There are one or more changes to the plot that
might be made that might lead to one or more alternate endings, arising as they will do from
alternate plots. Some characters that might undergo plot changes might be: Jane Fairfax, Harriet
Smith, and Mr. Knightley. Of course, plot changes to one of these characters would redound upon
and involve other characters.

Jane Fairfax:
Starting with Jane Fairfax, she might become permanently disillusioned with Frank Churchill and
abandon him and their secret engagement to actually take on governess duties for the Sucklings.
In this case, Frank would be free to be paired with , who might pity him, or with Harriet
Smith,. whom he might pity, especially after he comes into his fortune upon his aunt's death. As
a side not, secret engagements were so very bad because there was nothing to prevent other
eligible persons from paying court to either party and thus finding themselves dishonored and
possibly disgraced once the secret became known. The reason for this is that once a courtship
reached a certain consistency and state, an engagement followed by a marriage was expected in
order to preserve the moral purity of the parties courting.

Harriet Smith: Aside from the possibility mentioned above
stemming from a plot change to Jane's fortunes. Harriet might undergo her own plot change by
truly casting off Farmer Robert Martin and attaching her heart and hopes to Mr. Knightley. This
might end one of several ways. She might end alone after rejecting Martin in London and
unfruitfully attaching herself to Knightley. She might actually persuade Knightley or her
worthiness and love. In order for this latter one to occur, Knightley would have to undergo his
own plot change.

Mr. Knightley: Mr Knightley
might truly see Emma as a different sort of person than he had always imagined (or hoped) her to
be. The outing to Box Hill might very well bring about such a changed perception. He already
scolds her for her disrespectful ill-treatment of Miss Bates. He might see more in Emma's
insensitive behavior and flirtation with Frank and become deeply disgusted with and repulsed by
her so that his scolding was more than that, so that it was in fact a breach from her because of
her breach from that which is worthy and admirable. This might then drive Knightley to
appreciate and embrace the innocent, unspoilt simplicity of Harriet Smith. For Knightley, having
the high social position and prestige that he does, this connection could not demean him in
Highbury the way it would demean Elton, who is lower in status and prestige.

These are some possible plot changes the would yield alternate
endings. Another possibility for deriving an alternate ending is
to approach altering the plot through the lens of a particular literary
theory. For instance, you might rework the latter parts of the plot through the
lens of Feminist Criticism, where the women triumph and are independent from men, or through
Marxist Criticism, where wealth is bested by meager income (Jane, Harriet, Miss
Bates).

were [Miss Bates] prosperous, I could allow much
for the occasional prevalence of the ridiculous over the good. Were she a woman of fortune, ...
I would not quarrel with you for any liberties of manner. Were she your equal in situationbut,
Emma, consider how far this is from being the case. She is poor; she has sunk from the comforts
she was born to;...

Explain to what extent the four management functions are related and similar.

The four
main functions of management are planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. Planning
involves the creation of strategies to achieve company objectives. Organizing is whereby the
manager brings together the resources required to achieve the firms objectives. Since the
manager needs his or her employees to succeed, he or she has to motivate them to work towards
those goals. The act of influencing employees is called leading. The final function is
controlling. This is whereby the manager monitors and evaluates the performance of the workers
and the organization. The manager has...

How does the setting play a part in the story?

Walker's
" " reveals a woman surviving against uncaring and indifferent social and political
forces.  No one is consciously out to get her, but the society is uncaring and indifferent.  The
story is only incidentally about race or rudeness or cruelty.  These are just part of the
package that comes with existence.  The boy doesn't shoot her, and the same people in town that
are rude to her also give her the medicine she needs for free.  No one is out to get her, it's
just that nobody really cares and nobody is...

Two similar solids have a scale factor of 3 : 5. If the height of solid I is 3 cm, find the height of solid II.

We are given
that two solids, solid I and solid II, are similar with a scale factor of 3:5. The height of
solid I is given as 3 cm, and we are asked to find the height of solid II.

A
simple definition of similar figures is figures that have the same "shape" but not
necessarily the same size. A more rigorous definition is that a similarity is a transformation
that preserves angles and maps all lengths in the same ratio (often referred to as the scale
factor, the ratio of magnification, or the dilation factor). Another definition is a
transformation that preserves ratios of lengths.

If polygons are similar,
then corresponding angles are congruent, and corresponding side lengths are in the same ratio,
which is the scale factor. "Corresponding lengths" can include the lengths of
corresponding sides, diagonals, medians, heights, and so on.

If we assume
that the scale factor for a pair of similar figures is a:b, then all corresponding lengths are
in the ratio a:b, all corresponding areas are in the ration a² :b² , and all corresponding
volumes are in the ratio a³:b³.

For this problem, we have the
scale factor as 3:5, so all corresponding lengths, including height, are in a ratio of 3:5.
Thus, since the height of solid I is 3 cm, the height of solid II is 5
cm.

href="http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Similarity.html">http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Similarity.html