I think
that a couple of arguments need to be addressed in order to fully assess the American actions in
light of the attitudes leading to the war. The first would have to be that the modern
understanding of Hitler and the Holocaust might not be entirely applicable to the time period.
The easiest critique of the American isolationism prior to the war is to wonder how America
could be silent to the threat of Hitler and the Holocaust. The problem with this argument is
that it presumes a modern understanding of a historical and temporal reality. When we now use
"Hitler" and "The Holocaust," it is based on the historical understanding of
what the Holocaust actually was and what Hitler actually represented. It might be a bit unfair
to be able to use the lens of historical reflection and apply it to the temporal context of what
was happening. This is not to excuse isolationism in the face of pure terror, but rather to
understand the political calculations of the time. Simply put,...
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
What are the arguments that have to be considered when assessing the role of US policy prior to the outbreak of World War II?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How is Joe McCarthy related to the play The Crucible?
When we read its important to know about Senator Joseph McCarthy. Even though he is not a character in the play, his role in histor...
-
"Festival" addresses the age-old difficulty of generational gaps, in the setting of a traditional Chinese-style New Y...
-
Sipho Sepamla is a South African poet born in 1932. He wrote during Apartheid and had some of his work banned by the Apartheid regi...
-
An is an expression that has a meaning which cannot be derived from the combined meaning of its words. To put it somewhat different...
No comments:
Post a Comment