Wednesday, June 21, 2017

What are some examples of characterizations in Bierce's short story "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge"?

's
Civil War stories are well known for their shocking endings, and "" provides such an
ending. Histechniques vary according to the story but, on the whole, he applies the three most
common types of characterization(a) description and action, with authorial commentary; (b)
action alone, with no authorial commentary on the action; and (c) through depiction of a
character's inner self through the thoughts and feelings the character expresses. Of the three,
Bierce focuses on developing his character through the man's inner self.

When
we first encounter Farquhar, he is introduced only as "a man" who is standing on some
planks, with his hands behind his back and a rope around his neck, about to be hanged by some
Federal troops who are themselves only characterized by their actions in connection with the
hanging. In a brutal war, these men are silent and stone faced because death is both common and
expected.

Bierce first characterizes Farquharstill referred to a "the
man"with his observable characteristics:

He was a
civilian, if one might judge by his habit, which was that of a planter. His features were
good...his eyes were large and dark gray, and had a kindly expression which one would hardly
have expected in one whose neck was in the hemp.

Bierce's
observation of the man's "kindly expression" is a subtle, but important, observation
that immediately creates some sympathy for the as-yet unnamed victim of war.


The characterization moves from the outside world to within the character when Bierce
notes that the man "closed his eyes in order to fix his last thought upon his wife and
children," another slice of this man's life that creates sympathy in the reader. From this
point to the end, Bierce includes Farquhar's interior life in the characterizationwe know how
and what Farquhar feels and sees because we see the action through his eyes and are privy to his
interpretation of events.

Perhaps the most effective and startling use of
Farquhar's inner self is, appropriately, at the end when Farquhar's brain, starved of oxygen
because of the hanging, is still sending signals to his consciousness:


His eyes felt congested; he could no longer close them; his tongue
was swollen with thirst; he relieved its fever by thrusting it forward from beneath his teeth
into the cold air...he could no longer feel the roadway beneath his feet.


In Farquhar's last moment of consciousness, he is sensing the
consequences of the hangingprotruding eyes; tongue protruding from the mouth; no roadway to be
felt. Bierce's choice to maintain Farquhar's inner dialogue is a masterful touch of . Rather
than simply describing Farquhar's physical being at the point of death, Bierce has made us feel,
as if we are inhabiting Farquhar's body, his last sensations.

No comments:

Post a Comment

How is Joe McCarthy related to the play The Crucible?

When we read its important to know about Senator Joseph McCarthy. Even though he is not a character in the play, his role in histor...